Mots-clés
Hipótesis del Período Crítico
Hipótesis de la Diferencia Fundamental
procesamiento del lenguaje
adquisición de un segundo idioma
período sensible
Comment citer
Résumé
Cómo citar:
Alvarez-Swihart, P. (2005). The Critical Period Hypothesis: A review of current research. Pedagogía, 38(1), 85-97.
Références
DeKeyser, R.M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499-533.
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 78-104.
Friederici, A., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99( 1), 529-534.
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (in press). Critical evidence: A test of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. Psychological Science. Retrieved November 2, 2002, from http://www.stanford.edu/-hakuta/Docs/Critical%20Evidence.pdf
Hamers, J. & Blanc, M. (2000). Bilinguality and bilingualism, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liskin-Gasparro, J. (1999). M LJ reviews. Modern Language Journal, 83(4), 592-93.
Marinova-Todd, S., Marshall, D.B., & Snow, C. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 9-34.
Moskovsky, C. (2001). The critical period hypothesis revisited. Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Sept. 27-30, 200 I. Retrieved October 3, 2002, from http://linguistics.anu.edu.au/ALS200 I/proceedings.html
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 81-108.
Nikolov, M. (2000). The critical period hypothesis reconsidered: successful adult learners of Hungarian and English. IRAL, 38(2), 109-124.
Weber-Fox, C. & Neville, H.J. (Dec 2001). Sensitive periods differentiate processing of open- and closed- class words: An ERP study of bilinguals. [Electronic version]. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(6), 1338-1353. Retrieved November 16, 2002, from http://web5.infotrac.ga1egroup.com/itw/infomark/ 2 I 4/946/ 290 I 0728w5/purl=rc I_ EAIM _
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.