Redes interorganizacionales e interpersonales: el flujo de información estratégica entre empresas competidoras
PDF
XML
HTML
EPUB

Palabras clave

board interlock
redes sociales
redes interorganizacionales
tríadas
bróker

Cómo citar

Bitencourt-Fortes, M.-V., Wegner, D., & Peña-Ramírez, C. (2022). Redes interorganizacionales e interpersonales: el flujo de información estratégica entre empresas competidoras. Fórum Empresarial, 26(2), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.33801/fe.v26i2.19881

Resumen

Las conexiones entre empresas denominadas board interlock permiten obtener recursos y crear relaciones. Esta práctica, sea intencionada o no, genera conexiones que involucran el núcleo estratégico de la empresa. Así, existe un canal para el flujo de información estratégica, incluso entre competidores. Estudios previos han identificado la creación de estas conexiones, pero sin explorar a nivel de los individuos. Mediante un análisis de redes sociales (n=2184), se presentan resultados que contribuyen a identificar diferentes contextos nacionales (Estados Unidos y Alemania), donde las redes interpersonales tienen estructuras similares, aunque las redes interorganizacionales son estructuralmente diferentes. Este hallazgo es fundamental para mapear el control acerca del flujo de información estratégica. Finalmente, se identifica un nuevo papel de intermediaciones en tríadas a partir del análisis contextual de la figura del bróker en una relación de board interlock.

https://doi.org/10.33801/fe.v26i2.19881
PDF
XML
HTML
EPUB

Citas

Aranha, C. E., Rossoni, L., & Mendes-Da-Silva, W. (2016). Capital social do conselho de administração e desempenho de empresas de capital aberto brasileiras. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(1), 15–39.

Balestrin, A., Verschoore, J. R., & Reyes Junior, E. (2010). O campo de estudo sobre redes de cooperação interorganizacional no Brasil. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14(3), 458–477.

Belso-Martínez, J. A., Mas-Verdu, F., & Chinchilla-Mira, L. (2020). How do interorganizational networks and firm group structures matter for innovation in clusters: different networks, different results. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1659673

Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies.

Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159624

Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych-113011-143828

Cox Pahnke, E., McDonald, R., Wang, D., & Hallen, B. (2015). Exposed: venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1334– 1360. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0777

Ding, H., Hu, Y., Yang, X., & Zhou, X. (2021). Board interlock and the diffusion of corporate social responsibility among Chinese listed firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09767-9

Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 89–126.

Farina, M. C., Melo, R. S. D., & Dutra, F. G. A. (2021). Lacunas de conhecimento e cooperação: análise de uma rede social em um instituto de tecnologia da região do ABC Paulista. Interações (Campo Grande), 22(3), 941–957.

Granovetter, M. (2007). Ação econômica e estrutura social: o problema da imersão. RAE Eletrônica, 6(1).

Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Madhavan, R. R. (2011). How do networks matter? The performance effects of interorganizational networks. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.005

Hernandez, E., Sanders, W. G., & Tuschke, A. (2015). Network defense: pruning, grafting, and closing to prevent leakage of strategic knowledge to rivals. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1233–1260. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0773

Hofstede, G. (2016). Hofstede Index. Recuperado el 20 de mayo de 2020 de https://geert-hofstede.com.

Huijzer, M. J., & Heemskerk, E. M. (2021). Delineating the corporate elite: inquiring the boundaries and composition of interlocking directorate networks. Global Networks, 21(4), 791–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12316

Kirkels, Y., & Duysters, G. (2010). Brokerage in SME networks. Research Policy, 39(3), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.005

Lai, C. H., & Fu, J. S. (2021). Exploring the linkage between offline collaboration networks and online representational network diversity on social media. Communication Monographs, 88(1), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1869797

Meeusen, W., & Cuyvers, L. (1985). The interaction between interlocking directorships and the economic behaviour of companies. En F. N. Stokman, R. Ziegler, & J. Scott (Eds.), Networks of corporate power (pp. 45-72). Polity.

Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271

Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480

Opsahl, T., & Panzarasa, P. (2009). Clustering in weighted networks. Social Networks, 31(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.002

Pacheco, G. J. A. (2018). Nivel micro, meso, macro y meta en las redes turísticas. Revista Turydes: Turismo y Desarrollo, 11(25).

Raab, J., & Kenis, P. (2009). Heading toward a society of networks: empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(3), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492609337493

Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 92–121. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals. 2018.0121

Todeva, E. (2006). Business networks: strategy and structure. Routledge.

Vadasi, C., Bekiaris, M. & Andrikopoulos, A. (2019). Corporate governance and internal audit: an institutional theory perspective. Corporate Governance, 20(1), 175–190. https://doi. org/10.1108/CG-07-2019-0215

Valeeva, D., Heemskerk, E. M., & Takes, F. W. (2020). The duality of firms and directors in board interlock networks: a relational event modeling approach. Social Networks, 62, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.02.009

Verwaal, E. (2003). The Blackwell handbook of strategic management. Long Range Planning, 36(3), 314–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631218616.2006.x

Williams, T. (2005). Cooperation by design: structure and cooperation in interorganizational networks. Journal of Business Research, 58(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148- 2963(02)00497-6

Withers, M. C., Hillman, A. J., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 243–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311428671

Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2021). The influence of board interlocking network centrality on foundation performance: evidence from China. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2020.1841483

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2022 Fórum Empresarial

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.