Design and validation of an instrument to measure satisfaction with academic services by graduate students
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

Keywords

student satisfaction, academic services, instrument validation

How to Cite

González Acosta, E. G. (2022). Design and validation of an instrument to measure satisfaction with academic services by graduate students. Revista Griot, 15(1), 1–20. Retrieved from https://revistas.upr.edu/index.php/griot/article/view/17606

Abstract

This research focused on the design, validation, and analysis of an instrument that measured the level of satisfaction with academic services of graduate students from a private university in the southern area of ​​Puerto Rico. The design was mixed with an exploratory approach. In the qualitative phase, eight students participated through a semi-structured interview. In the quantitative phase, 262 students participated. Content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. Qualitative findings demonstrated that having potential, competitiveness, extracurricular activities, class loads, and flexible service hours influence the level of satisfaction with academic services. Regarding the quantitative phase, the instrument used to collect the data was designed in this research and yielded a reliability index of .947. On the other hand, by means of the statistical analysis, the construct validity of the instrument was carried out by applying a factor analysis. As a final result, the instrument consists of three factors and 58 items. The quantitative findings showed in the factor analysis that there are three factors that explain 40.0% of the variable satisfaction with academic services. It was recommended to periodically develop the application of the instrument to determine evaluation processes to improve the services offered by the institution.

PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
EPUB (Español (España))

References

Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2004). La Medición de la Satisfacción en la Enseñanza Universitaria: el ejemplo de la Universidad Beira Interior. Revista Internacional de Marketing Público y No Lucrativo, 1(1), 73-88. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1418918

Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3th ed.). Sage.

Daniel, W. (2004). Biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in the health sciences (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Davis, C. (2020). Statistical testing with Jamovi and Jasp. Vor Press.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

Inzunza Melo, B., Ortiz Moreira, L., Pérez Villalobos, C., Torres Araneda, G., McColl Calvo, P., Meyer Kother, A., Matus Betancourt, O., Bastías Vega, N., & Bustamante Durán, C. (2015). Estructura Factorial y Confiabilidad del Cuestionario de Satisfacción Académica en Estudiantes de Medicina Chilenos. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación - e Avaliação Psicológica, 2(40), 73-82. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4596/459645432008.pdf

Lawshe, C. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Lent, R., & Brown, S. (2008). Social Cognitive Career Theory and subjective well-being in the context of work. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 6-21. https://doi/10.1177/1069072707305769

Lent, R., Singley, D., Sheu, H., Janet, B., Schmidt, A., & Schmidt, C. (2007). Relation of social-cognitive actors to academic satisfaction in engineering student. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072706294518

Ley de Reforma Educativa de Puerto Rico, Ley Núm. 85 de 29 de marzo de 2018, 3 LPRA §§ 9801-9816(c) (2021) (Lexis).

Medina-Diaz, M., & Verdejo-Carrión, A. (2019). Evaluación del aprendizaje estudiantil (6ta ed.). Experts Consultants.

Medrano, L., Pérez, E., & Fernández, M. (2014). Sistema de Evaluación Informatizado de la Satisfacción Académica para Estudiantes Universitarios de Primer Año. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12 (02), 541-562. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2931/293131824013.pdf

Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.

Mayo, E. (1946). Problemas humanos de una civilización industrial, Ediciones Nueva Visión.

Pecina, R. M. (2019). Evaluación de la satisfacción académica del estudiante de enfermería sobre la calidad del servicio educativo. Revista Electrónica sobre Educación Media y Superior, 6(11). https://www.cemys.org.mx/index.php/CEMYS/article/download/288/314/1119

Pichardo-Martínez, M., García-Berbén, A., De la Fuente-Arias, J., & Justicia-Justicia, F. (2007). El estudio de las expectativas en la universidad: Análisis de trabajos empíricos y futuras líneas de investigación. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 9(1). https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/153/263

Vergara-Morales, J., Del Valle, M., Díaz, A., & Pérez, M. V. (2018). Adaptación de la escala de satisfacción académica en estudiantes universitarios chilenos. Psicología Educativa, 24, 99-106. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2018a15

Zalazar, M. F., & Cupani, M. (2018). Adaptación de las escalas de expectativas de resultado, metas de progreso y satisfacción académica en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 20(3), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.24320/redie.2018.20.3.1675

Zas, B. (2016). Experiencias en Psicología hospitalaria: La satisfacción como indicador de excelencia en la calidad de los servicios de salud. https://www.alfepsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Psicologia-Hospitalaria-Barbara-Zas.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Enid Guelmary González Acosta

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.