Keywords
Private property
legitimacy
money
individualism
collectivity
Political Science
legitimacy
money
individualism
collectivity
Political Science
Abstract
The author contrasts the positions of John Locke and Gerrard Winstansley regarding the debate on private property, specifically in the context of 17th century Philosophy.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Georg Fromm, The natural equality of men in descartes , Diálogos: Year XXXVIII, No. 81, January, 2003
Similar Articles
- Kathia Hanza, The "reduction of morality to aesthetics" according to Nietzsche , Diálogos: Year XXXVIII, No. 81, January, 2003
- Étienne Helmer, Desplazar y reconfigurar los lugares: Una operación política de Platón , Diálogos: No. 98 (2015)
- Silvia Gabriel, A political reading of the notion of "crisis" from the hermeneutic program of Paul Ricoeur , Diálogos: No. 104 (2019)
- Jairo José da Silva, Making a World , Diálogos: No. 111 (2022)
- Étienne Helmer, PLATO AT THE MARKETPLACE , Diálogos: No. 103 (2018)
- María del Pilar Montoya, The fair uses of lies and dissimulation according to Plato: two alternatives against decay and the political crisis? , Diálogos: No. 104 (2019)
- Dialitza Colón Pérez, Art scenes: artistic practice and aesthetic experience in jacques rancière. , Diálogos: No. 101 (2017)
- Carlos Rojas Osorio, Torretti: on conceptual change in science , Diálogos: Year XXXVII, No. 79, January, 2002
- Elvin Blanco, The Question of Video Gaming as a Political Activity , Diálogos: No. 107 (2021)
- Ana Carina Vilares, Recognition and public space: the challenge of receiving refugees and migrants in our cities , Diálogos: No. 106 (2020)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.