Keywords
Private property
legitimacy
money
individualism
collectivity
Political Science
legitimacy
money
individualism
collectivity
Political Science
Abstract
The author contrasts the positions of John Locke and Gerrard Winstansley regarding the debate on private property, specifically in the context of 17th century Philosophy.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Georg Fromm, The natural equality of men in descartes , Diálogos: Year XXXVIII, No. 81, January, 2003
Similar Articles
- Octavian Gabor, Taming the Beast: Constantin Noica and Doing Philosophy in Critical Political Contexts , Diálogos: No. 104 (2019)
- Richard Tieszen, Elements of Godel's Turn to Transcendental Phenomenology , Diálogos: No. 91 (2008)
- Jean Carlos Sirias, Las exigencias de la autarquía. Aristóteles y la invención de la otredad , Diálogos: No. 105 (2020)
- Yuiza Turey Martínez Rivera, The spatiality of justice in Plato: the case of the warriors , Diálogos: No. 106 (2020)
- Alvaro López Fernández, Michela Massimi (editor), Kant and Philosophy of Science Today, Series: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, University College London, 2008, 212 pp. , Diálogos: No. 91 (2008)
- Xinli Wang, Hume is nota Skeptic About Induction , Diálogos: No. 78 (2001)
- Christopher Powers Guimond , Todos somos los 4,645: El luto imposible y el Verano Boricua , Diálogos: No. 109 (2021)
- Sara Gavrell, The Medicalization of Love: Some Notes on the Perils of the Quick Tech Fix Anti-Love Bio/Enhancement Project , Diálogos: No. 109 (2021)
- Eliseo Cruz Vergara, La antropología en sentido pragmático de kant como una filosofía de la ciencia, sobre los puntos de visita de Kant y Hegel , Diálogos: No. 83 (2004)
- Ulises Moulines, The methodological location of meta-scientific structuralism , Diálogos: Year XXXVII, No. 79, January, 2002
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.