Keywords
Private property
legitimacy
money
individualism
collectivity
Political Science
legitimacy
money
individualism
collectivity
Political Science
Abstract
The author contrasts the positions of John Locke and Gerrard Winstansley regarding the debate on private property, specifically in the context of 17th century Philosophy.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Georg Fromm, The natural equality of men in descartes , Diálogos: Year XXXVIII, No. 81, January, 2003
Similar Articles
- Ana Carina Vilares, Recognition and public space: the challenge of receiving refugees and migrants in our cities , Diálogos: No. 106 (2020)
- Riccardo Caporali, The (failed) education of the lector philosophus , Diálogos: No. 100 (2016)
- Francisco José Ramos, Intuitive science and the concept of beatitude , Diálogos: No. 100 (2016)
- Ángela Calvo de Saavedra, Justicia y buenas maneras (politeness): dos artificios necesarios para una sociedad floreciente , Diálogos: No. 111 (2022)
- Cristina Zaltieri, Non frangere sed firmare: Spinoza, un maestro sin pedagogía , Diálogos: No. 100 (2016)
- Monique Dixsaut, Del hombre gregario al animal gregario. De Platón hacia Nietzsche, y vuelta , Diálogos: No. 98 (2015)
- John D Norton, Einstein's triumph of the space-time coordinate system , Diálogos: Year XXXVII, No. 79, January, 2002
- Eliseo Cruz Vergara, English title , Diálogos: No. 90 (2007)
- Annie Larivée, «An Unexamined Life is not Worth Living for Human Beings» , Diálogos: No. 98 (2015)
- Xristián Quezada, Un programa naturalista para la filosofía de la ciencia , Diálogos: No. 78 (2001)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.