Abstract
This paper examines the validity of the argument that symmetry between capital budgeting-decision making and post-performance evaluation can be achieved by the use of annuity depreciation. The examination was made by comparing the results for a given investment project under varying sets of rename or cash flows using the annuity and straight-line depreciation methods. The findings suggest that the attributes claimed by the proponents of the annuity scheme of depreciation do not stand the tests made.By submitting a contribution to consideration of the Editorial Board of Fórum Empresarial, the authors attest that it is an original, unpublished work, which has not been nor will be simultaneously submitted to another journal for consideration and publication; that they are responsible for the work carried out and the content of the article; and they have the corresponding copyrights.
The authors grant the right of first publication of their work to Fórum Empresarial, in any medium and physical and electronic format, including internet. Publication shall be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which allows third parties to share the work, provided that the author and Fórum Empresarial (as a first publication) are cited.
The journal allows authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Fórum Empresarial.