Limits of wilderness
Portada No. 114, 2024
PDF (English)

Mots-clés

wilderness
Wilderness Act
spectrum
Leopold
pluralism

Comment citer

Simpson, S. (2024). Limits of wilderness. Diálogos, 55(114), 81–115. Consulté à l’adresse https://revistas.upr.edu/index.php/dialogos/article/view/21259

Résumé

Few debates in environmental philosophy have been more heated than the one over the nature of wilderness. And yet, when one surveys the present scene, one finds that a variety of different conceptions of wilderness are still quite popular – some more so in certain professions than others. In this paper, I look at three popular conceptions of wilderness with an eye toward sussing out the good and the bad them. I look at what I call (1) the folk view of wilderness, (2) Leopold’s conception of wilderness, and (3) the legal conception of wilderness (as found in the Wilderness Act of 1964). In the final part of the paper, I sketch out a sort of spectrum account of wilderness, one that I argue allows us to capture more cases of wilderness and might serve as a useful tool in future conservation efforts.

PDF (English)
Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.