Credit Rationing: a debate in macroeconomics
PDF

Keywords

credit
profit
petitioners
Stiglitz
credit rationing

How to Cite

Barea Lugo, S. (2017). Credit Rationing: a debate in macroeconomics. Ceiba: Revista De La Universidad De Puerto Rico En Ponce (en preparación), 5(2), 77–87. Retrieved from https://revistas.upr.edu/index.php/ceiba/article/view/5620

Abstract

Some people could assume that, in giving creadit, the more credit the banks would give, the more profit they could make. But when credit is rationed, only the loans with the surest payment return expectancy are accorded, and banks collect what they expect. If instead of rationing credit, banks just asked for higher rates for it, the actual effect in the loan portfolio could be proved to bet hat a higher percentae of loan petitioners would fail to pay, so they loan portfolio would be composed of a higher percentage of unsage loans and consequently profit would be less. Thus, by rationing credit, banks maximize profit better than by raising interest rates. Stiglitz won the Nobel prize in Economics by providing the banks' behavior in credit rationing (1981).
PDF
Los artículos son responsabilidad de sus autores y no se autoriza la reproducción de los textos ni de las ilustraciones sin la previa autorización de éstos, quienes, tras la publicación en Ceiba, conservan los derechos de autor de sus trabajos. Esto aplica, de igual manera, al arte que se utiliza en la portada, la contraportada y las páginas que identifican las distintas secciones de la revista.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.