On the Heideggerian interpretation of the principle of sufficient reason.

Abstract

It is common for specialists in the various authors of the history of philosophy to raise objections to Heidegger's interpretations. Scholars of the so-called pre-Socratics, of Plato, of Aristotle, of medieval thought, of Descartes, of  Leibniz, of Kant, of Hegel, of Nietzsche, of Husserl consider that, in each case, Heidegger is mistaken, arbitrary, or, at least, does not do sufficient justice to the author or the epoch of which he speaks author or to the epoch of which he speaks.